All articles

A prospective noun clause packs a whole future statement into one noun, so it can serve as the object of a main verb — as in 'he said he would come' or 'I hope we will begin'.

What this clause does

Turkish does not join a future statement with a word for "that". It rebuilds the statement as a single noun and drops it straight into the main sentence. geleceğini söyledi is "he said he would come": the whole idea "he would come" has become one word, geleceğini, sitting where the object of söylemek belongs.

Everything the clause reports is still ahead — expected, promised, hoped or feared. yapacağımı biliyor is "she knows what I will do" and kazanacağından eminim is "I am sure he will win". Each names an event that has not happened yet, which is the force this ending carries.

Vowel harmony picks the ending

The ending harmonises two ways with the last vowel of the stem. Front vowels — e, i, ö, ü — pull it to -ecek; back vowels — a, o, u, and dotless ı — pull it to -acak. Rounding plays no part, so the four front vowels act as one set and the four back vowels as another.

A stem that already ends in a vowel takes a buffer -y- before the ending, so two vowels never meet. okumak gives okuyacağını and başlamak gives başlayacağımızı — the -yecek and -yacak shapes in the last column are just -ecek and -acak with that glide in front.

Softening before the possessive

In this construction the ending almost always carries a possessive, and that possessive opens with a vowel. Before a vowel the final k of -ecek softens to ğ, giving -eceğ, which then takes the possessive as -eceği. That softening is why the clause is written geleceğini with a soft consonant and not a hard k.

The subject and the closing case

Two suffixes ride on the softened ending, in a fixed order. A possessive comes first and names the subject of the embedded clause — the same endings that mark "my", "your" or "his" on a noun. In geleceğini it is third person, "he"; in yapacağımı first person, "I"; in başlayacağımızı first person plural, "we".

A case suffix comes second, chosen by the main verb, and fixes the clause's job in the sentence. Most verbs take an object, so the accusative is commonest — yapacağımı biliyor, geleceğini söyledi. A verb that governs another case pulls the clause into it: kazanacağından eminim sits in the ablative, döneceğine söz verdi in the dative. After a third-person possessive a buffer -n- joins the case, the -n- you see inside geleceğini and döneceğine.

Five worked clauses

Each form below is a whole future clause compressed into one word. The possessive tells you who the subject is, and the case tells you how the clause fits the main verb. Read each as the bracketed part of an English "that…" clause.

Future against fact

This clause has an exact factual twin. The -DIK noun clause reports something realised — geldiğini söyledi, "he said he had come" — while the -ecek clause reports something unrealised, still ahead — geleceğini söyledi, "he said he would come". The syntax is identical, a possessive plus a case standing as an argument; only the time value flips. Choose by whether the embedded event is already a fact or still to happen.

Noun clause versus participle

The same -ecek morpheme also builds an adjective. As a relative participle it modifies a noun and carries no case: okuyacağım kitap is "the book I will read", where the form describes the noun. In the noun clause it works the opposite way — the form itself becomes the noun, taking a possessive and a case and standing as an argument, so geleceğini is the object of söylemek. Same morpheme, two syntaxes: one qualifies a noun, the other becomes one.

The possessive marks the subject

Because the clause has no finite verb of its own, its subject shows up as the possessive on the ending. Change the person and you change the possessive: geleceğini is "that he will come", yapacağımı is "what I will do", başlayacağımızı is "that we will begin". The embedded subject can also appear as a genitive pronoun — benim, senin, onun — though it is usually dropped, since the possessive already carries the person.

The main verb chooses the case

The clause's case is not free — the main verb assigns it, exactly as it would to a plain noun object. A verb that takes a direct object puts the clause in the accusative: yapacağımı biliyor, "she knows what I will do". A verb that governs the ablative puts it there: kazanacağından eminim, "I am sure he will win", from emin olmak. A verb that governs the dative does the same: döneceğine söz verdi, "he promised he would return", from söz vermek. Learn the clause's case together with the verb that calls for it.

A common mistake with the wrong twin

A frequent slip is to reach for the factual -DIK when the sense is plainly about the future. yarın geldiğini söyledi tries to say "he said he would come tomorrow", but yarın forces a future reading, so the realised geldiğini clashes and the prospective geleceğini is required. The same trap catches promises: döndüğüne söz verdi is meant for "he promised he would return", yet a promise is inherently about what is to come, so it must be döneceğine söz verdi — döneceğine, never the realised form.